Case Results

After years of rejecting any fault for a serious car crash, the Defendant and his insurer ultimately agreed to resolve the case – just before trial was set to begin. Our Firm secured a $1,000,000.00 settlement following determined negotiations. The Defense sought to diminish our Client’s claim by arguing that the vehicle impact was minor, that he made a good recovery without losing time from work, and that his need for surgery was tied to a pre-existing neck condition rather than the collision. Through detailed investigation, extensive litigation, and careful trial preparation, we positioned the case to demonstrate that our Client’s neck injury and surgery were caused by the crash, leading to a significant settlement.

After years of denying any fault for causing a serious car accident, the Defendant and his insurance company finally negotiated this matter in good faith – on the eve of trial.  Our Firm was able to secure a $1,000,000.00 settlement after intense negotiations.  The Defense attempted to avoid responsibility by claiming that our Client was responsible for the accident, and that our Client had a good recovery from her injuries.  After thoroughly investigating the facts, and after substantial litigation and trial preparation, we successfully made the Defendant take responsibility for his negligence.  This case demonstrates our Firm’s commitment to zealously advocate for our injured clients, and to thoroughly prepare their case for Trial.

Our firm secured a $2,000,000 pre-trial settlement award for a client who suffered injuries on a job site. The defense attempted to avoid responsibility by claiming that multiple witnesses saw our client build his own unsafe workspace and that he was entirely at fault for the accident. Through careful investigation and strong advocacy, we demonstrated the truth of what happened and held the defendants accountable. This recovery will help our client move forward after a life-changing incident and underscores our commitment to fighting for injury victims when the other side tries to shift blame.

Worker injured on a construction site as a result of a dangerous condition.  Our client sustained a back injury that required surgery.

The defendant failed to stop or yield, violating the client’s right of way and causing a two-car accident. The defendants argued that our client was speeding, and her injuries were not caused by the accident. As a result, the client sustained injuries to her shoulder, knee and back. The case settled for $1,150,000 for pain and suffering.

Premises case against City of New York.  Fall due to unsafe conditions on the property.  Neck herniated disc with surgery

Trip and fall on broken asphalt in the parking lot of a commerical property. Our client sustained a back injury that required surgery.

Our client was rear-ended while operating a ride-share vehicle in bumper-to-bumper traffic. There was virtually no damage to the vehicles involved.  The plaintiff sustained neck and back injuries.  The defendant tendered their insurance policy and we were able to secure a massive settlement from the ride-share company insurance policy.  The total settlement was $1,000,000.00

Our client was rear-ended while operating an Uber vehicle. Neck and back herniated discs with surgery.

Labor Law/Construction Accident.  Fall due to unsafe debris at dangerous worksite.  Lower back herniated disc with surgery.

Our client was operating a box truck that was hit by the corner-fender of an 18-wheeler on the LIE during rush hour.  The vehicles showed minimal damage.  The plaintiff injured his lower back in the accident.  We were able to secure a summary judgment against the defendant early in the case, which lead to an ultimate resolution of $850,000.00 on the eve of trial.

Motor vehicle accident involving a negligent Uber driver.   Neck herniated disc with surgery

Our client was the passenger on a boat that was involved in a head-on collision with another boat.  We litigated the matter in Federal and State Court, ultimately securing a $975,000.00 settlement on the Plaintiff’s behalf during discovery.